SSA Overarching Thoughts

From Agile Systems Engineering Wiki
Revision as of 22:22, 13 October 2014 by 13321 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Some structure to our thoughts

  • We were talking at different levels
    • Doing agile for different reasons (different whys)
    • Applying it to different levels of system (different whats)
    • Using different underpinning approaches (different hows)
  • Some elements line up, some don’t

Different whys

  1. The SE process is time-consuming and boring, we want to start building stuff immediately
  2. I need to deliver something within my length of tour – and agile is the only possible was to get something!
  3. The system’s environment will change after we deploy the solution, we need to keep updating the system to remain effective
  4. The customer and users are unable to define the requirements up front as their understanding of what they need will change as we develop the system
  5. Getting something out there early Deliver a new product using SE with the non value added and time-consuming elements removed is better than waiting the for perfect solution late
  6. Because it is the next ‘silver bullet’ we need to be doing

Different whats

  • What is the system of interest?
  1. The ‘user interface’ / mission software
  2. All the software
  3. A subsystem
  4. The product system
  5. The operational capability

Different hows

  1. Ignore the formal SE process, it’s just useless bureaucracy
  2. Selectively ‘value engineer’/tailor the SE process to focus effort on the greatest value adding elements of SE
  3. Buy of the shelf kit
  4. Split the development into different stages and develop each stage within a fixed timebox, progressively integrate each stage as they are developed, confirm it works prior to final acceptance
  5. Split the development into different stages, develop, deploy and evaluate each stage within a fixed timebox
  6. Split technology development and product development.
    • Develop a high-level ‘integration architecture’
    • Develop sub-systems/technologies as stand alone workstreams
    • Launch products at defined points driven by marketing/planners. At a fixed pointy prior to product release selecting the most mature/relevant technology available. Undertake system integration, manufacture and launch.

Alignment

  • Some elements align, some don’t
  • See grids in word documents
The ‘user interface’ / mission software All the software A subsystem The product system The operational capability
The SE process is time-consuming and boring, we want to start building stuff immediately Supports Supports Supports Supports Supports
I need to deliver something within my length of tour – and agile is the only possible was to get something! Supports Supports Supports Supports Supports
The system’s environment will change after we deploy the solution, we need to keep updating the system to remain effective Doesn’t support Doesn’t support Doesn’t support Supports Supports
The customer and users are unable to define the requirements up front as their understanding of what they need will change as we develop the system Supports? Doesn’t support Doesn’t support Supports Supports
Getting something out there early Deliver a new product using SE with the non value added and time-consuming elements removed is better than waiting the for perfect solution late Supports? Doesn’t support Doesn’t support Supports Supports
Because it is the next ‘silver bullet’ we need to be doing Supports Supports Supports Supports Supports


The SE process is time-consuming and boring, we want to start building stuff immediately I need to deliver something within my length of tour – and agile is the only possible was to get something! The system’s environment will change after we deploy the solution, we need to keep updating the system to remain effective The customer and users are unable to define the requirements up front as their understanding of what they need will change as we develop the system Getting something out there early Deliver a new product using SE with the non value added and time-consuming elements removed is better than waiting the for perfect solution late Because it is the next ‘silver bullet’ we need to be doing
Ignore the formal SE process, it’s just useless bureaucracy Supports Supports Doesn’t support Doesn’t support Doesn’t support Supports
Selectively ‘value engineer’/tailor the SE process to focus effort on the greatest value adding elements of SE Supports Supports Doesn’t support Doesn’t support Supports Supports
Buy of the shelf kit Supports Supports Doesn’t support Doesn’t support Supports Supports
Split the development into different stages and develop each stage within a fixed timebox, progressively integrate each stage as they are developed, confirm it works prior to final acceptance Doesn’t support Doesn’t support? Doesn’t support Supports Doesn’t support Supports
Split the development into different stages, develop, deploy and evaluate each stage within a fixed timebox Supports? Supports Supports Supports Supports Supports
Split technology development and product development Doesn’t support Doesn’t support? Supports Supports Supports Supports

Agile Systems Engineering Working Group Wiki

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox