Difference between revisions of "Omega WIP page"

Revision as of 10:46, 3 December 2015

Overview

The current active thinking of the Omega structure is that it is based on 6 key questions, and from the perspectives of at least two stakeholders with respect to MBSE:

• An individual systems engineer;
• An engineering manager (with responsibility for a project, or organisational unit / department / function).

Current generic questions are proposed to be (JJ have deliberated re-ordered to bring Why to top):

1. Why should I adopt MBSE?
2. What does MBSE mean for my role?
3. Where (activity area, disciplines level of decomp) do I employ MBSE?
4. When (temporal e.g. life cycle phase, criteria) should MBSE be employed?
5. Who else needs to participate in MBSE activities?
6. How do I make use of MBSE on my project?

So what we see below are two subsections, for each of these two primary roles, and with an elaborated response for each of the 6 questions, for each role.

Details

Individual Systems Engineer

Why should I adopt MBSE?

(elaborated response)

What does MBSE mean for my role?

(elaborated response)

Where (activity area, disciplines level of decomp) do I employ MBSE?

(elaborated response)

When (temporal e.g. life cycle phase, criteria), should MBSE be employed?

(elaborated response)

Who else need to participate in MBSE activities?

(elaborated response)

How do I make use of MBSE on my project?

(elaborated response)

An engineering manager

1. Why should I adopt MBSE?
2. What does MBSE mean for my role?
3. Where (activity area, disciplines level of decomp) do I employ MBSE?
4. When (temporal e.g. life cycle phase, criteria), should MBSE be employed?
5. Who else need to participate in MBSE activities?
6. How do I make use of MBSE on my project?