Difference between revisions of "SSE Meeting 23"
(Created page with "INCOSE UK Service Systems Engineering Working Group Meeting: 23 January 2017, Keynsham, Bristol == Attendees == Andrew Farncombe, Alan Crawford, John Davies, Iain Cardow,...") |
(→Next Meeting) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Attendees == | == Attendees == | ||
| − | Andrew Farncombe, Alan Crawford, John Davies, Iain Cardow, Sarvar Ahmad, Edwin | + | Andrew Farncombe, Alan Crawford, John Davies, Iain Cardow, Sarvar Ahmad, Edwin Swidenbank |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | ==Review of existing work== | ||
=== Grow the group === | === Grow the group === | ||
| + | John D had generated e-mailer for this meeting sent twice to all members of the group. Several new members have joined. Having six at this meeting was a good number and meant all could contribute. | ||
| − | + | === Present and get feedback === | |
| − | + | Iain_C in contact with the Bristol Group with regard to presenting further work and getting feedback. The Bristol Group are looking at setting up study areas and this could be one of them. | |
| − | === | + | |
| − | + | ||
=== Competencies for Services === | === Competencies for Services === | ||
| − | Alan_C | + | Alan_C presented work taking the existing SE Competencies and asking if Services required a similar, lower, or higher level of competence. This lead to discussion and some adjustment. AC will update. |
=== Stakeholders === | === Stakeholders === | ||
| − | John D to | + | John D presented a table of Stakeholders concerned with services and relating them to Artefacts of Services and then considering these against the example services we have been considering. It was felt that these should be linked to process/lifecycle. The lifecycles in the SE Handbook were considered. It was felt that ITIL and TOGAF were being used extensively for IT services the lifecycles associated with these should be considered. |
=== Groups of Services === | === Groups of Services === | ||
| − | John D | + | John D had investigated grouping suggested at ASEC but found not major differences to the Characteristics groupings. He had then considered using the Artefacts as a means of grouping, but this had not got very far. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | == Famework for Service Systems Engineering == | |
| + | It was generally felt that current work was missing a framework that would cover/relate major aspects: lifecycle, process, artefacts, stakeholders, lines of development etc. and that providing such a framework would be a major contribution that this group could make. TOGAF and ITIL provide some of this for IT-based services. Our work needs to include this as well as the non-IT aspects - Equipment, People, Support, etc. Agreed that our next meeting will focus on providing this through consideration of an example service. | ||
== Next Meeting == | == Next Meeting == | ||
| − | Monday | + | Monday 27 March 2017 11-30 to 15-30, Babcock, Keynsham, Bristol. |
Latest revision as of 19:32, 26 March 2017
INCOSE UK Service Systems Engineering Working Group
Meeting: 23 January 2017, Keynsham, Bristol
Contents |
[edit] Attendees
Andrew Farncombe, Alan Crawford, John Davies, Iain Cardow, Sarvar Ahmad, Edwin Swidenbank
[edit] Review of existing work
[edit] Grow the group
John D had generated e-mailer for this meeting sent twice to all members of the group. Several new members have joined. Having six at this meeting was a good number and meant all could contribute.
[edit] Present and get feedback
Iain_C in contact with the Bristol Group with regard to presenting further work and getting feedback. The Bristol Group are looking at setting up study areas and this could be one of them.
[edit] Competencies for Services
Alan_C presented work taking the existing SE Competencies and asking if Services required a similar, lower, or higher level of competence. This lead to discussion and some adjustment. AC will update.
[edit] Stakeholders
John D presented a table of Stakeholders concerned with services and relating them to Artefacts of Services and then considering these against the example services we have been considering. It was felt that these should be linked to process/lifecycle. The lifecycles in the SE Handbook were considered. It was felt that ITIL and TOGAF were being used extensively for IT services the lifecycles associated with these should be considered.
[edit] Groups of Services
John D had investigated grouping suggested at ASEC but found not major differences to the Characteristics groupings. He had then considered using the Artefacts as a means of grouping, but this had not got very far.
[edit] Famework for Service Systems Engineering
It was generally felt that current work was missing a framework that would cover/relate major aspects: lifecycle, process, artefacts, stakeholders, lines of development etc. and that providing such a framework would be a major contribution that this group could make. TOGAF and ITIL provide some of this for IT-based services. Our work needs to include this as well as the non-IT aspects - Equipment, People, Support, etc. Agreed that our next meeting will focus on providing this through consideration of an example service.
[edit] Next Meeting
Monday 27 March 2017 11-30 to 15-30, Babcock, Keynsham, Bristol.
