Difference between revisions of "SSE Meeting 42"
(→Attendees) |
(→Relationship of using NAF and SysML with with using Archimate/TOGAF) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
(The Architectures Working Group have started a Workstream on this. WE can keep track of it.} | (The Architectures Working Group have started a Workstream on this. WE can keep track of it.} | ||
| − | == Relationship of using NAF and SysML | + | == Relationship of using NAF and SysML with using Archimate/TOGAF == |
SW has used the standard SE modelling methods and the Service modelling tools | SW has used the standard SE modelling methods and the Service modelling tools | ||
=== NAF and SysML === | === NAF and SysML === | ||
| − | + | *NAF has emerged as the Architectures Frame Work basis for MBSE. It has some limitations that are not always appreciate. | |
| − | + | *NAF is derived from DoDAF, MoDAF, and other NAFs that were developed tO cover areas of engineering that were seen as needing better coverage - such as MoDAF TEPIDOIL | |
| − | + | *SYSml WAS developed as an add-on to UML which itself was a set of three software development diagrams | |
===Archimate/TOGAF=== | ===Archimate/TOGAF=== | ||
| − | + | These are both 'owned/su[pported' by The Open Group to provide process and implementation for services. They support each other and are used in development of business services. | |
| + | |||
| + | Arcgchimate and SysML provide gra[hic languages for displaying engineering mofrld ands so can be compared. | ||
| + | . ToGAPH provides a process for analysingng, designing and developing services. | ||
| + | |||
==Can we map the Services Definitions Diagram onto Archimate Views (or Viewpoints)== | ==Can we map the Services Definitions Diagram onto Archimate Views (or Viewpoints)== | ||
Revision as of 13:00, 16 August 2021
Contents |
Attendees
John Davies, Iain Cardow, Simon Wright, Mark Womersley
Relationship of SSE to MBSE
Work to transfer representation of the information on Stakeholder Interactions depicted in the Onion Diagram using SysML and Archimatew
(The Architectures Working Group have started a Workstream on this. WE can keep track of it.}
Relationship of using NAF and SysML with using Archimate/TOGAF
SW has used the standard SE modelling methods and the Service modelling tools
NAF and SysML
- NAF has emerged as the Architectures Frame Work basis for MBSE. It has some limitations that are not always appreciate.
- NAF is derived from DoDAF, MoDAF, and other NAFs that were developed tO cover areas of engineering that were seen as needing better coverage - such as MoDAF TEPIDOIL
- SYSml WAS developed as an add-on to UML which itself was a set of three software development diagrams
Archimate/TOGAF
These are both 'owned/su[pported' by The Open Group to provide process and implementation for services. They support each other and are used in development of business services.
Arcgchimate and SysML provide gra[hic languages for displaying engineering mofrld ands so can be compared. . ToGAPH provides a process for analysingng, designing and developing services.
Can we map the Services Definitions Diagram onto Archimate Views (or Viewpoints)
Presenting SSE activity/outputs
Presented by NH at last meeting. JD to try out.
Date of next meeting
2 4th October 2021, via Microsoft Teams 14:00 to 16:00.
